Atlanta Federal Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. dismissed my GA lawsuit this morning at 11:12 am after I filed 270 pages of fraud evidence yesterday at 6 pm.
20 page order. He must have been working on order for days or he is quicker than FBI in Nashville!
McConnell has been lying to Trump for 4 years with regard to Judicial appointments
McConnell has been controlling the affirmation of judges.
and he finally brazenly came out against Trump last when he said he would reject any written objections on 6th Jan regarding the electoral college votes. He is treacherous
The SC will either not hear any of the cases or if it will, Gorsuch , Kavanaugh and Barrat will not support any Trump motion. Their rejection to hear the Texas et al case due to Article 3 was preposterous. Article 3 has a very low bar. “ controversy between states”. That is the standing required. As Alito
and Thomas wrote “ the majority had no discretion not to hear it “.
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrat colluded to abstain, knowing that their abstention would produce a 3-2
rejection without having to openly go with the lefties.
I told my friends that they would do this a few weeks before the election . I smelled a rat when Kavanaugh allows penn to count votes 3 days after the election !!!
McConnell has organised all that Judicial corruption
Trump thought that McConnell was helping him to affirm constitutional judges , whereas McConnel was installing Judges that would do what McConnell wanted
You state: "Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrat colluded to abstain, knowing that their abstention would produce a 3-2 rejection without having to openly go with the lefties."
That is incorrect. They voted with the judges other than Alito and Thomas JJ.
Your claim against McConnell cannot be substantiated.
As you are older than I, I ask your forgiveness in advance for disagreeing with you
Your understanding that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrat
voted with the leftist judges to deny to hear the Texas et al ( 19 states altogether ) is incorrect
The three of them abstained
The leftist press who have brainwashed the public for 4 years with untruths , brainwashed you as well to think that it was a 7-2 vote .
If you google the ruling you will see that the Google results show WApo, NYT failing to report it was a 3-2 decision and that the 3 weaklings abstained
The official statement from the SC which is disgraceful in its subterfuge , leads one to think that the only dissenters were Thomas and Alito. Perhaps that is what led you to believe so
If you don’t believe me , call the court yourself and you will
discover what really happened
McConnell: I know from inside the kitchen David
However just for those who don’t have the contacts .What about McConnell announcing he will vote against any written objections on 6th Jan and is speaking to other senators to ensure they do also !
McConnell is the head of the swamp in the Rep party .
I would respectfully suggest you need to ring the Court to confirm your suspicion as you are the one making the allegation and need to back up your allegation that three judges abstained.
I rely on the published Order that indicates no judge abstained:
"The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."
Get back to me after you have rung the Supreme Court.
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
Atlanta Federal Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. dismissed my GA lawsuit this morning at 11:12 am after I filed 270 pages of fraud evidence yesterday at 6 pm.
20 page order. He must have been working on order for days or he is quicker than FBI in Nashville!
Koncepolski Yankeljust now
McConnell has been lying to Trump for 4 years with regard to Judicial appointments
McConnell has been controlling the affirmation of judges.
and he finally brazenly came out against Trump last when he said he would reject any written objections on 6th Jan regarding the electoral college votes. He is treacherous
The SC will either not hear any of the cases or if it will, Gorsuch , Kavanaugh and Barrat will not support any Trump motion. Their rejection to hear the Texas et al case due to Article 3 was preposterous. Article 3 has a very low bar. “ controversy between states”. That is the standing required. As Alito
and Thomas wrote “ the majority had no discretion not to hear it “.
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrat colluded to abstain, knowing that their abstention would produce a 3-2
rejection without having to openly go with the lefties.
I told my friends that they would do this a few weeks before the election . I smelled a rat when Kavanaugh allows penn to count votes 3 days after the election !!!
McConnell has organised all that Judicial corruption
Trump thought that McConnell was helping him to affirm constitutional judges , whereas McConnel was installing Judges that would do what McConnell wanted
ReplyDelete
You state: "Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrat colluded to abstain, knowing that their abstention would produce a 3-2 rejection without having to openly go with the lefties."
That is incorrect. They voted with the judges other than Alito and Thomas JJ.
Your claim against McConnell cannot be substantiated.
Hi David
As you are older than I, I ask your forgiveness in advance for disagreeing with you
Your understanding that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrat
voted with the leftist judges to deny to hear the Texas et al ( 19 states altogether ) is incorrect
The three of them abstained
The leftist press who have brainwashed the public for 4 years with untruths , brainwashed you as well to think that it was a 7-2 vote .
If you google the ruling you will see that the Google results show WApo, NYT failing to report it was a 3-2 decision and that the 3 weaklings abstained
The official statement from the SC which is disgraceful in its subterfuge , leads one to think that the only dissenters were Thomas and Alito. Perhaps that is what led you to believe so
If you don’t believe me , call the court yourself and you will
discover what really happened
McConnell: I know from inside the kitchen David
However just for those who don’t have the contacts .What about McConnell announcing he will vote against any written objections on 6th Jan and is speaking to other senators to ensure they do also !
McConnell is the head of the swamp in the Rep party .
I would respectfully suggest you need to ring the Court to confirm your suspicion as you are the one making the allegation and need to back up your allegation that three judges abstained.
I rely on the published Order that indicates no judge abstained:
"The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."
Get back to me after you have rung the Supreme Court.
David, I will not argue with you. I have no need to call the SC
Those like Victor who attend my weekly Torah class know that when I make a public statement, I do so after very careful research
Koncepolski Yankeljust now
I am not making an allegation David
You present your evidence that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrat dissented along with the 3 activist lefties
Can you point up the actual words in the ruling that prove that?
Nowhere in the ruling you quoted does it state how many assenters there were.
It only states how many dissenters there were
All the best
Yankel
ReplyDelete